Blog

On Conflicting Evidence in Evidentiary Motions during DUI Prosecutions in Los Angeles.

January 27, 2014

It is often said that courts will believe police officers over defendants or defendant’s witnesses.  That is true in any criminal cases in Los Angeles, including DUI prosecutions.  The typical reason provided for the courts viewing of officers as more credible – is police’s supposed lack of interest in the outcome of the case (a ludicrous rational because police officer do care about the outcome of the case even in TV shows like Law and Order).  The true reason for giving more weight to officer’s credibility is the design of the criminal justice system which is primarily based on the first hand observations of its police officers.  Simply, the criminal justice system would collapse if the courts would not give […]

Read more »

Wanted Flyer as a basis for investigatory detention for a DUI in Los Angeles

December 15, 2013

On occasion a police officer will write in his police report that the reason he initiated an enforcement stop is based on a dispatch call that a car matching the description of the stopped car was reported stolen or involved in a crime. More often then not, once a police officer makes contact with the driver, he will verify that the car is not the car from the dispatch call.  Yet, once the police officer makes contact with the driver, if he notices any “objective signs of intoxication”, he will commence a DUI investigation that can often culminate in a DUI arrest. So, what can a person arrested for a DUI do in a situation like that? (aside from requesting […]

Read more »

When Should You Not Hire An Attorney To Defend a DUI Case

November 28, 2013

Most DUI arrests in Los Angles can be defended using legal or scientific arguments.  Our skilled DUI attorneys will help you defend your DUI case in Los Angeles county (or in some case in neighboring counties).  Guilt of a DUI driver in Los Angles (and the rest of the state and country) is based on what the government can prove.  Intoxication, after all, is highly subjective! Yes, there are cases that are difficult to defend.  On the other hand, there are cases that are extremely easy to defend.  Yet, many fall in the middle.  Please call our office directly at (323) 464-6424 to talk to an attorney specializing in drunk driving defense for a free consultation.  You can tell us […]

Read more »

DUI Punishment – Can a Defendant Be Sentenced for Both (a) and (b) count of 23152?

July 18, 2013

Most DUI prosecutions in Los Angeles start with a DUI arrest when the arrested person is often cited for California Vehicle Code section 23152(a) or for both California Vehicle Code section 23152(a) and California Vehicle Code section 23152(b).   If a driver is not cited for CVC 23152(b), his blood alcohol concentration is either below 0.08% or is not available, such is the case with blood tests or refusals to submit to a chemical test. If and when the results become available, the prosecutor will likely charge both a California Vehicle Code section 23152(a) and a California Vehicle Code section 23152(b).  In a case that proceeds to trial, the prosecutor will attempt to prove that the defendant is guilty of […]

Read more »

DUI In Los Angeles: Tinted Windows Stop

July 17, 2013

I am addressing a limited question – legality of your traffic stop when you were arrested after a tinted windows DUI stop. A cop pulls you over – approaches driver’s side – looks at you – smells alcohol.  Next scene, you are in the back of the police car on your way to some sheriff’s station or local jail because that cop realized you were drinking.  If your blood or breath test comes back above 0.08% of alcohol by weight in blood – your are facing DUI charges.   You will be asking yourself a question: why were you pulled over? Many cops believe that all tinting is illegal.  That is simply not true.   If you were pulled over […]

Read more »

“Lawful coercion” – when not explained consequences of refusal

July 5, 2013

In Bumper v. North Carolina 391 U.S 542 (1968), the Supreme Court ruled that consent is not valid (i.e. no consent) when official conducting the search informed the owner of house that he possesses a warrant and then asked for consent.  The argument of USSC based on claim of coercion – they called it “lawful coercion“. In determining whether a criminal defendant was convicted “according to law,” the test is not and cannot be simply whether this Court finds credible the evidence against him. Crediting or discrediting evidence is the function of the trier of fact, in this case a jury. The jury’s verdict is a lawful verdict, however, only if it is based upon evidence constitutionally admissible. When it is […]

Read more »

Dismiss Los Angles DUI – Lack of Arrest (People v. Hawkins)

July 2, 2013

On June 21, 1970, Allan Hawkins ran a stop-sign and hit another car, killing his passenger and injuring a person in that other car. (People v. Superior Court (Hawkins) 6 Cal 3d 757 (1972).  CHP took a vial of Hawkins’ blood from the hospital (to which he was taken to by an ambulance). But CHP never arrested Allan Hawkins.   Once authorities obtained results of the blood test, Hawkins was charged with felony drunk driving and felony vehicular manslaughter.  Hawkins’ lawyer filed a motion to suppress his blood test results based on (1) Hawkins’ consent was not given freely and voluntarily and (2) no exception to warrantless search of Hawkins.   The second argument needs a little explaining: The government […]

Read more »

DUI DEFENSE: DUI ABSORPTION RATE

June 28, 2013

In the United States, a DUI is considered a very serious offense. In 1980th, approximately 25,000 people died in DUI accidents per year. Since then, the states put a lot of effort into prosecuting DUI drivers. By 2014, the number of death from DUI-related accidents dropped to just below 10,000 people per year. While this is still a large number, the tough stance on DUI offenses appears to be paying off. The total number of people arrested for drunk driving in the United States is over 1 million arrests per year.  The prosecution all over the United States and California is extremely tough on DUI cases, often prosecuting borderline cases – that is, cases that if not a DUI, would […]

Read more »

Relationship between amount of alcohol in blood and breath for DUI investigation in Los Angeles.

June 27, 2013

A true measure of alcohol in a person’s body is done by analyzing the blood.  However, most Los Angeles DUI cases do not involve blood analysis.  Insead, most persons arrested for DUI in Los Angeles provide a breath sample.  To convert breath sample to a blood alcohol level, a machine (such as EC/IR, or a DamaMaster DMT) will determine number of alcohol particles in a person’s breath sample and multiply it by 2100.  Thus, it is assumed that 2100 cubic centimeters of breath will contain the same amount of alcohol as 1 cubic centimer of blood.  This is based on legal assumption that all person have the same conversion ration between breath and blood concentration of alcohol regardless of age, […]

Read more »

One Leg Stand Test Unreliability During DUI Investigations

June 19, 2013

NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) over thirty years ago researched and determined that out of numerous filed sobriety tests used by law enforcement, the most reliable are the One Leg Stand Test, the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test, and the Walk and Turn Tests. Here, I will discuss One Leg Stand Test (OLS) and its reliability (or rather unreliability), during a DUI stop in Los Angeles. NHTSA determined that 83% of people who exhibit two more “clues” during poor performance on One Leg Stand Test will have a blood alcohol content of .08% or higher. First off, that means that 17% of people who fail this test are not under the influence.  But more importantly, other factors that intoxication can affect […]

Read more »

1 20 21 22 23 24 27

ATTENTION

THIS WEBSITE IS CREATED FOR ADVERTISEMENT PURPOSES AND DOES NOT ESTABLISH AN ATTORNEY CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. UNLESS THERE IS A CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN ATTORNEY AND CLIENT. DO NOT USE INFORMATION ON THIS WEBSITE FOR LEGAL ADVICE WITHOUT TALKING TO AN ATTORNEY ABOUT SPECIFICS OF YOUR CASE. EXAMPLES AND CONSULTATION WILL NOT GUARANTEE INDIVIDUAL RESULTS.
ALL CONTENT ON THIS SITE IS CREATED FOR ATTORNEY ALEX ANDRYUSCHENKO