DUI Probation: Terms and Conditions
DUI Probation is a very common resolution in many DUI cases. However, the law does not require that a defendant is placed on probation. Instead, a defendant in a DUI case can resolve his or her case for a “terminal disposition” meaning that after the sentencing, there are no obligations to the court because after the sentence is complete and the case is over. In fact, you must agree to be placed on probation.
Defendants Want to Be on DUI Probation to Avoid Jail Time.
Some defendants are not eligible for DUI probation because of their record or the nature of the offense. For instance, if you are charged with a 3rd felony, the DA can allege a special allegation under California Penal Code section 1203(e)(4), which disqualifies another grant of probation.
In contrast, most misdemeanor DUIs are sentenced to summary probation. It is also common for felony DUI to be sentenced to probation (especially on 1st offense). A person on felony probation will be supervised by the probation office. In contrast, misdemeanor probation (unless it is a Ventura County case) does have supervision. If a defendant is found guilty and the court decides that probation is appropriate, the court has broad discretion in determining what condition of probation should be imposed (California Rule of Court 4.414). For example, some sentencing courts will impose as a condition of DUI probation that the defendant completely abstains from drinking alcohol and does not visit any locations where alcohol is sold. Other DUI probation conditions can be equally harsh and you might want to hire an attorney to argue to the court that your DUI probation conditions should be different. (California Penal Code section 1203.1(j)). California Supreme Court in People v. Lent, 124 Cal 3d 481 provided a rule for the imposition of terms and conditions of probation:
“…a condition of probation will not be held invalid unless it
(1) has no relationship to the crime of which the offender was convicted
(2) related to conduct that is not in itself criminal
(3) requires or forbids conduct which is not reasonably related to future criminality…”
The Lent‘s court determined that “conditions which regulate conduct, not itself criminal must be reasonably related to the crime of which the defendant was convicted or to future criminality”. But, while the sentencing court can not make conditions of DUI probation that “exceed the bounds of reason” if an objection to the term of probation is not raised at the time of sentencing, such objection is waived for appeal (People v. Welch 5 Cal 4th 228 (1993)).
You or your attorney must speak up and object to a condition of probation in open court at the time of sentencing, or you lose that right. You must argue that the condition of probation you don’t like is overbroad and unreasonable and it has little bearing on factors contributing to the particular crime. For example, if the court imposes a condition that is not related to a DUI prosecution, you must object at the time the court orders it. You can request that the court order a probation report to have the Probation Department weigh in on the sentence (this is very uncommon for misdemeanors in Los Angeles County). If the probation department prepares a favorable probation report, the recommendation of the probation department will be very convincing to the Court. A probation report has to be prepared in felony cases, but is completely discretionary in misdemeanor cases. Note: Ventura County places DUI offenders on Formal DUI probation, a very unusual sentence by Los Angeles County standards.
Also, under recent changes in the law, probation for most cases is limited to 1 year for misdemeanors and 2 years for felonies. This law does not apply to DUI, however, it does apply to “wet reckless” cases, a common alternative to DUI cases. Also, this new law applies retroactively to persons who were placed on probation prior to the new law.
PEOPLE V. KITE (87 Cal.App. 5th 986)
This 2023 decision from the San Diego Division of the California Court of Appeals limits DUI probation to the maximum possible punishment under the conviction. ,, was convicted of a DUI and a Hit-and-Run, both felonies. Under the sentencing laws, his maximum exposure for a felony DUI is 3 years in the California State Prison, and a felony Hit and Run carries an additional maximum of 8 months. The 8 months is calculated based on the law which states that when a person is convicted of 2 crimes in the same case, he can be sentenced to the highest number of years under the most serious crime and then an additional jail time can be added for any other crimes not to exceed 1/3 the midterm for any additional crimes. A hit-and-run sentencing range is 16 months (low term), 2 years (mid-term) and 3 years (upper term). Because the midterm is 2 years, a third of it is 8 months. Thus, the maximum jail time for Kite for the felony DUI and felony hit-and-run convictions is 3 years and 8 months.
The court held that the length of probation for DUI cases cannot exceed the maximum punishment. This means that Kite’s maximum probationary period is 3 years and 8 months. The court thus reduced his probation from 5 years (the original sentence) to 3 years and 8 months.
Thus, if you are on probation for a felony DUI for 5 years, you can reduce the probation to 3 years as long as you do not have other convictions or special allegations. Los Angeles DUI attorney can get your probation period reduced. Call Criminal Defense Attorney Los Angeles Now.
If you believe that the conditions of DUI probation imposed on you are not fair and are not reflective of the facts of the case, call us so that we can discuss with you the modification of your DUI probation. Also, if you are in violation of your DUI probation, call Los Angeles DUI lawyer. We can help avoid a probation violation and save you from a possible jail sentence. Keep in mind, that the new law in California allows the judges to deny expungements, to wit, dismissal under PC 1203.4, when defendants did not complete their probation successfully. Call (818) 921 7744 to get a free consulttheirconditionsLent’s,,,ation from one of the best DUI attorneys in Los Angeles. We are here to provide you with quality defense at an affordable price.
What Happens When Probation Expires Before a Violation Hearing?
Los Angeles DUI attorney, recently handled hearings where the court wasn’t sure if it had authority. The Defendant was placed on 5 years of DUI probation. As the probation term approached its end, the court decided that the defendant violated probation and revoked his probation. The court was thinking that because the five-year term was running out, the defendant was in violation, the court had to violate probation or lose jurisdiction.
But the court was not correct. California Supreme Court in People v. Leiva (2013) 56 Cal.4th 498 opines why. If you’re facing a similar situation, an experienced dismissal DUI attorney Los Angeles can help you get a dismissal of the probation violation.
The Rule Courts Get Backwards
There’s a misconception that a probationary end once the calendar date passes. That’s not the rule as Penal Code 1203.2(a) explains.
The rule, as clarified in Leiva, is about when the conduct occurred, not when the hearing happens. Section 1203.2(a) provides that a revocation of probation — summary or otherwise — tolls the running of the probationary period. Once the court revokes probation based on an alleged violation, the clock stops. The formal hearing on that violation can then be held later — sometimes much later — without the passage of that time defeating the court’s jurisdiction, as long as the underlying violation itself occurred within the original, unextended probationary term.
In other words, if the violation happened while the person was still on probation, the court doesn’t lose the authority to address it just because the formal hearing gets pushed past the original expiration date.
What Leiva Actually Held
The California Supreme Court in Leiva resolved a split among the Courts of Appeal on this issue. Some courts had suggested that a probationer whose probation was summarily revoked remained bound to the conditions of probation indefinitely, with the term extending automatically until a hearing could happen. Others held the opposite: that tolling exists for one purpose only — to preserve the court’s jurisdiction to determine, at a later date, whether a violation occurred during the court-imposed period.
The Supreme Court adopted the later view. The Court held that tolling…
“preserves the trial court’s authority to adjudicate, in a subsequent formal probation violation the waring, when whether the probationer violated probation during, but not after, the court-imposed probationary period.“
The limitation Leiva imposes runs in the defendant’s favor for conduct occurring after the term ends — but it also gives the court’s authority for conduct that occurred while probation was still active, no matter when the hearing on that conduct actually takes place. So if probation is revoked, the hearing can take place years after the violation as long as it addresses the violation during the original probation term.
Why This Helped Our Client
Our client’s failure to complete the DUI program and pay restitution was a condition of probation that had to be satisfied within the 5-year term. The obligation existed, and the alleged breach of that obligation occurred5-year within the probationary period the court imposed.
The court thought that they must violate probation before 5 years are up. Leiyva explains that the court can wait (which gave our client the chance to fully comply with probation).
Only things Mr. Leiva did during his probation could be used against him, even if the hearing happened much later.
The Practical Point: DUI Probation Violation
If you are on Los Angeles DUI probation, make sure you comply with the terms, and if the court for any reason, fails to violate your probation on time, the court can still have the hearing after the original term of probation expires. Being in revoked status is not a big deal if you catch up to the obligations and are able to show the court compliance. Most judges will reinstate probation without even a violation.
Talk to a Los Angeles DUI Attorney About Your Probation Violation
Probation violation hearings involving jurisdiction and tolling issues are technical, and the outcome often turns on details most defendants — and sometimes even the court — can easily get wrong. If you’re facing a violation allegation in Los Angeles or Orange County, Los Angeles DUI attorney can review your case history and timeline to determine exactly where your case falls under Leiva and PC 1203.2. As a Los Angeles DUI attorney practice focused on DUI defense, probation violation hearings, and other criminal law violations, we know how to identify when a court is overstepping — or underestimating — its own jurisdiction.
This post discusses general legal principles arising from a recent matter and does not constitute legal advice. Every probation violation case turns on its specific facts and procedural history. Contact Los Angeles DUI Attorney reinstateExpiresthe hadThe defendantthe violated, the losewasdismissala to discuss your situation.
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading...